Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany shopping experience:
1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.
2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about
3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany? Wrong! If the Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.
4. Questions - Got a question about Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....
5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.
6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.
7. Feedback - happy with your Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.
8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site
9. Contact - got a question about Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.
10. Payment - ready to pay for your Federal Constitutional Court Of Germany, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.
The
Federal Constitutional Court (in
German language:
Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) is a special court established by the German Constitution, the
Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany (Basic Law). Since its inception, the Court has been located in the city of
Karlsruhe, intentionally dislocated from the other federal institutions like the seat of the government (earlier in Bonn, now in
Berlin) or the head office of the
Bundesnachrichtendienst in
Munich.
The sole task of the court is judicial review. It may therefore declare public acts Constitutionality and thus render them ineffective. As such, it is similar to the Supreme Court of the United States. Yet the Court possess a number of powers not open to the U.S. Supreme Court (see below). However, it differs from the U.S. Supreme Court and other supreme courts in that it is not an integral part of the regular judicial system (save for the areas of constitutional law and public international law), but rather installed as a separate judicial institution. Many other countries around the world possess separate constitutional courts similar to the Federal Constitutional Court.
Most importantly, the Court does not serve as a regular
court of appeals from lower courts or the
Supreme_court#Germany as a sort of “superappellate court” on any violation of federal laws. Its jurisdiction is focused on constitutional issues, the integrity of the
Grundgesetz and the immediate compliance of any governmental institution in any detail (article 1 subsection 3 of the
Grundgesetz). Even constitutional amendments or changes passed by the Parliament are subject to its judicial review, since they have to be compatible with the most basic principles of the
Grundgesetz (due to its Article 79 (III), the so called 'eternity clause').
The court’s practice of enormous constitutional control frequency on the one hand, and the continuity in judicial restraint and political revision on the other hand, have created a unique defender of the
Grundgesetz since World War II and given it a remarkably valuable role in a modern democracy.
Procedures
Article 20 subsection 3 of the
Grundgesetz stipulates that all the three branches of the state –legislative, executive and judicial– are bound directly by the constitution. As a result, the court can abolish acts of all three branches as unconstitutional — either for formal violations, e.g. exceeding powers or violating procedures, or for material conflicts, e.g. because the civil rights prescribed in the
Grundgesetz were not respected.
Decisions of the court on material conflicts are put into force through a federal law by the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG).
The Constitutional Court has several strictly defined procedures in which cases may be brought before it:
- With a Constitutional Complaint (Verfassungsbeschwerde), any person may file a complaint alleging that his or her constitutional rights were violated. Although only a small fraction of these are actually successful (ranging around 2.5 % since 1951), several of these resulted in major legislation overturns, especially in the field of taxation. The large majority of the court's procedures fall in this category, with 135,968 such Complaints filed from 1957 to 2002.
- Several political institutions, including the governments of the States of Germany, may bring a law passed by the federal legislation before the court if they consider it unconstitutional (procedure of Abstract Regulation Control). The most well-known examples of these procedures included legislation legalizing abortion, which -- in highly debated rulings -- were German Federal Constitutional Court abortion decision twice by the Constitutional Court.
- In addition, any regular court which has doubts about whether a law in question for a certain case is in conformance with the constitution may suspend that case and bring this law before the Federal Constitutional Court (procedure of Concrete Regulation Control).
- Federal institutions, including members of the Bundestag, may bring internal disputes over competences and procedures before the court (Federal Dispute).
- The States of Germany may bring disputes over competences and procedures between them and federal institutions before the court (State-Federal Dispute).
- Committee on parliament investigation, including single members of the Bundestag, or the federal government may bring internal disputes over competences and procedures in case of committee’s investigation before the court (Investigation Committee Control).
- Violations of election laws may be brought before the court by political institution or any involved voter (Federal Election Scrutiny).
- Impeachment cases against the President of Germany or a judge, member of one of the Federal Supreme Courts, brought by the Bundestag, the Bundesrat (Germany) or the federal government, based on violation of constitutional or federal law (Impeachment Procedure).
- Finally, only the Constitutional Court has the power to prohibit a political party in Germany. This has only happened twice in the 1950s: the Sozialistische Reichspartei (SRP), an outright Neo-Nazism party, was banned in 1952, the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) was banned in 1956. A third such procedure to prohibit the extremist right-wing National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD) (NPD) spectacularly failed in 2003 after the court discovered that many of the party officials were in fact controlled by the German secret services that had injected its agents for the sake of surveillance. The result was very tight with 4 votes standing against another 4 votes. (It should be noted that the court did not decide on the ban itself)
Organization
The Court consists of two Senates, each of which has eight members, headed by a senate’s chairman. The members of each Senate are allocated to three Chambers for hearings in Constitutional Complaint and Single Regulation Control cases. Each Chamber consists of three judges, so each Senate chairman is at the same time a member of two Chambers.
Decisions by a Senate require an absolute majority of 5 votes (in some cases a ⅔ majority is required, i.e. 6 out of 8 votes), decisions by a Chamber need to be unanimous. A Chamber is not authorized to overrule a standing precedent of the Senate to which it belongs; such issues need to be submitted to the Senate as a whole. Similarly, a Senate may not overrule a standing precedent of the other Senate; such issues will be submitted to a plenary meeting of all 16 judges (the "Plenum").
Unlike all other German courts, the court often publishes the vote count on its decisions (though only the final tally, not every judge's personal vote) and even allows its members to issue a dissenting opinion. This possibility, which was only introduced in 1971, is a remarkable deviation from German judicial tradition.
One of the two Senate Chairmen is also the President of the Court, the other one is the Vice-President. The presidency alternates between the two Senates, i.e. the successor of a President is always chosen from the other Senate. The current president of the Court is
Hans-Jürgen Papier.
Election of judges
The Court's judges are elected by the Bundestag and the Bundesrat (Germany). According to the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, each of these bodies selects four members of each Senate, while the authority to select the Court's President alternates between them. The selection of a judge requires a ⅔ majority.
As a matter of fact, the Bundestag has delegated this task to a special body ("Richterwahlausschuss"), consisting of a small number of Bundestag members. This procedure has caused some constitutional concern and is considered to be unconstitutional by many scholars. However, it has never been challenged in a court.
The judges are elected for a 12-year term, but they must retire when reaching the age of 68. A judge must be at least 40 years old and must be a well-trained jurist. Three out of eight members of each Senate must have served as a judge of a Federal Supreme Court. Of the other five members of each Senate, most judges previously served as a professor of law at a University, a public servant or an attorney. After ending their term, most judges withdraw themselves from public life. However, there are some prominent exceptions, most notably Roman Herzog, who was elected President of Germany in 1994, shortly before the end of his term as President of the Court.
Members
First Senate (current only)
{||border=0 cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1"! width="350" |
Name! width="250" |
Term|-|
Hans-Jürgen Papier (*1943)(President of the Court, Chairman of the Senate)] (*
1949)] (*1938)] (*1939)] (*1950)] (*1940)] (*1943)] (*1954)|11/2004 - 11/2016 (retirement)|-|}
Second Senate (current only)
{||border=0 cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1"! width="350" |
Name! width="250" |
Term|-|
Winfried Hassemer (*
1940)(Vice-President of the Court, Chairman of the Senate)] (*
1946)] (*
1944)] (*1954)] (*
1954)] (*
1953)] (*
1948)] (*1948)|10/2005 - 4/2016 (retirement)|-|}
Presidents of the Senate
All judges
External links
- www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de, the Court's website
- Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) in German
- Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) in English
The
Federal Constitutional Court (in
German language:
Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) is a special court established by the German Constitution, the
Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany (Basic Law). Since its inception, the Court has been located in the city of
Karlsruhe, intentionally dislocated from the other federal institutions like the seat of the government (earlier in
Bonn, now in
Berlin) or the head office of the
Bundesnachrichtendienst in Munich.
The sole task of the court is judicial review. It may therefore declare public acts Constitutionality and thus render them ineffective. As such, it is similar to the
Supreme Court of the United States. Yet the Court possess a number of powers not open to the U.S. Supreme Court (see below). However, it differs from the U.S. Supreme Court and other
supreme courts in that it is not an integral part of the regular judicial system (save for the areas of constitutional law and public international law), but rather installed as a separate judicial institution. Many other countries around the world possess separate constitutional courts similar to the Federal Constitutional Court.
Most importantly, the Court does not serve as a regular court of appeals from lower courts or the Supreme_court#Germany as a sort of “superappellate court” on any violation of federal laws. Its jurisdiction is focused on constitutional issues, the integrity of the
Grundgesetz and the immediate compliance of any governmental institution in any detail (article 1 subsection 3 of the
Grundgesetz). Even constitutional amendments or changes passed by the Parliament are subject to its judicial review, since they have to be compatible with the most basic principles of the
Grundgesetz (due to its Article 79 (III), the so called 'eternity clause').
The court’s practice of enormous constitutional control frequency on the one hand, and the continuity in judicial restraint and political revision on the other hand, have created a unique defender of the
Grundgesetz since World War II and given it a remarkably valuable role in a modern democracy.
Procedures
Article 20 subsection 3 of the
Grundgesetz stipulates that all the three branches of the state –legislative, executive and judicial– are bound directly by the constitution. As a result, the court can abolish acts of all three branches as unconstitutional — either for formal violations, e.g. exceeding powers or violating procedures, or for material conflicts, e.g. because the civil rights prescribed in the
Grundgesetz were not respected.
Decisions of the court on material conflicts are put into force through a federal law by the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG).
The Constitutional Court has several strictly defined procedures in which cases may be brought before it:
- With a Constitutional Complaint (Verfassungsbeschwerde), any person may file a complaint alleging that his or her constitutional rights were violated. Although only a small fraction of these are actually successful (ranging around 2.5 % since 1951), several of these resulted in major legislation overturns, especially in the field of taxation. The large majority of the court's procedures fall in this category, with 135,968 such Complaints filed from 1957 to 2002.
- Several political institutions, including the governments of the States of Germany, may bring a law passed by the federal legislation before the court if they consider it unconstitutional (procedure of Abstract Regulation Control). The most well-known examples of these procedures included legislation legalizing abortion, which -- in highly debated rulings -- were German Federal Constitutional Court abortion decision twice by the Constitutional Court.
- In addition, any regular court which has doubts about whether a law in question for a certain case is in conformance with the constitution may suspend that case and bring this law before the Federal Constitutional Court (procedure of Concrete Regulation Control).
- Federal institutions, including members of the Bundestag, may bring internal disputes over competences and procedures before the court (Federal Dispute).
- The States of Germany may bring disputes over competences and procedures between them and federal institutions before the court (State-Federal Dispute).
- Committee on parliament investigation, including single members of the Bundestag, or the federal government may bring internal disputes over competences and procedures in case of committee’s investigation before the court (Investigation Committee Control).
- Violations of election laws may be brought before the court by political institution or any involved voter (Federal Election Scrutiny).
- Impeachment cases against the President of Germany or a judge, member of one of the Federal Supreme Courts, brought by the Bundestag, the Bundesrat (Germany) or the federal government, based on violation of constitutional or federal law (Impeachment Procedure).
- Finally, only the Constitutional Court has the power to prohibit a political party in Germany. This has only happened twice in the 1950s: the Sozialistische Reichspartei (SRP), an outright Neo-Nazism party, was banned in 1952, the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) was banned in 1956. A third such procedure to prohibit the extremist right-wing National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD) (NPD) spectacularly failed in 2003 after the court discovered that many of the party officials were in fact controlled by the German secret services that had injected its agents for the sake of surveillance. The result was very tight with 4 votes standing against another 4 votes. (It should be noted that the court did not decide on the ban itself)
Organization
The Court consists of two Senates, each of which has eight members, headed by a senate’s chairman. The members of each Senate are allocated to three Chambers for hearings in Constitutional Complaint and Single Regulation Control cases. Each Chamber consists of three judges, so each Senate chairman is at the same time a member of two Chambers.
Decisions by a Senate require an absolute majority of 5 votes (in some cases a ⅔ majority is required, i.e. 6 out of 8 votes), decisions by a Chamber need to be unanimous. A Chamber is not authorized to overrule a standing precedent of the Senate to which it belongs; such issues need to be submitted to the Senate as a whole. Similarly, a Senate may not overrule a standing precedent of the other Senate; such issues will be submitted to a plenary meeting of all 16 judges (the "Plenum").
Unlike all other German courts, the court often publishes the vote count on its decisions (though only the final tally, not every judge's personal vote) and even allows its members to issue a
dissenting opinion. This possibility, which was only introduced in 1971, is a remarkable deviation from German judicial tradition.
One of the two Senate Chairmen is also the President of the Court, the other one is the Vice-President. The presidency alternates between the two Senates, i.e. the successor of a President is always chosen from the other Senate. The current president of the Court is Hans-Jürgen Papier.
Election of judges
The Court's judges are elected by the
Bundestag and the
Bundesrat (Germany). According to the
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, each of these bodies selects four members of each Senate, while the authority to select the Court's President alternates between them. The selection of a judge requires a ⅔ majority.
As a matter of fact, the Bundestag has delegated this task to a special body ("Richterwahlausschuss"), consisting of a small number of Bundestag members. This procedure has caused some constitutional concern and is considered to be unconstitutional by many scholars. However, it has never been challenged in a court.
The judges are elected for a 12-year term, but they must retire when reaching the age of 68. A judge must be at least 40 years old and must be a well-trained jurist. Three out of eight members of each Senate must have served as a judge of a Federal Supreme Court. Of the other five members of each Senate, most judges previously served as a professor of law at a University, a public servant or an attorney. After ending their term, most judges withdraw themselves from public life. However, there are some prominent exceptions, most notably Roman Herzog, who was elected
President of Germany in 1994, shortly before the end of his term as President of the Court.
Members
First Senate (current only)
{||border=0 cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1"! width="350" |
Name! width="250" |
Term|-|
Hans-Jürgen Papier (*
1943)(President of the Court, Chairman of the Senate)] (*
1949)] (*
1938)] (*
1939)] (*1950)] (*1940)] (*1943)] (*1954)|11/2004 - 11/2016 (retirement)|-|}
Second Senate (current only)
{||border=0 cellpadding="2" cellspacing="1"! width="350" |
Name! width="250" |
Term|-|
Winfried Hassemer (*1940)(Vice-President of the Court, Chairman of the Senate)] (*
1946)] (*
1944)] (*
1954)] (*1954)] (*
1953)] (*
1948)] (*
1948)|10/2005 - 4/2016 (retirement)|-|}
Presidents of the Senate
All judges
External links
- www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de, the Court's website
- Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) in German
- Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) in English
Federal Constitutional Court of Germany - Wikipedia, the free ...
The Federal Constitutional Court (in German: Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) is a special court established by the German Constitution, the Grundgesetz (Basic Law).
The Federal Constitutional Court
Action brought by the PDS/Die Linke parliamentary group against the deployment of Tornado aircraft in Afghanistan rejected [ Judgment]
The beginnings of Germany's federal constitutional court ...
The beginnings of Germany's federal constitutional court. Borowski, Martin (2003) The beginnings of Germany's federal constitutional court. Ratio Juris, 16 (2). pp. 155-186.
Federal Court of Justice of Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A decision handed down by the BGH can only be reversed by the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in rare cases of unconstitutionality.
The Federal Constitutional Court
Organization
INEX: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Federal Constitutional Court ...
Federal Constitutional Court of Germany ... Table of Contents. 1 Procedures; 2 Organization; 3 External links; The ...
Federal Constitutional Court Act (Bundesverfassungsgerichts-Gesetz ...
Long title: Law on the Federal Constitutional Court (Gesetz über das ... at all times faithfully observe the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany ...
The Federal Constitutional Court: an Introduction
The German authorities would be prevented for constitutional reasons from applying these acts in Germany. The Federal Constitutional Court therefore reviews ...
Reference for Federal Constitutional Court of Germany - Search.com
Federal Constitutional Court of Germany ... Wikipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Are you an expert in this subject?
JURIST - Paper Chase: Germany constitutional court upholds Bavaria ...
JURIST] Germany's Federal Constitutional Court [official website, in German] on Tuesday upheld [ruling, in German; press release, in German] a state ban on smoking in public ...
